CCXO Notes
CXO Notes› Ideas› Four Schools of American Foreign Policy

Idea · carried by 1 source

Four Schools of American Foreign Policy

Walter Russell Mead's taxonomy from *Special Providence* identifying four recurring factions in American foreign policy debates: Hamiltonian, Wilsonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian. He argues these “four suits in a deck of cards” have been fighting each other since the 1790s, and most Americans hold a mixed hand.

Where it comes from

Mead developed this framework in his book Special Providence (published around 9/11) and explains it to Patrick O'Shaughnessy on Invest Like the Best (highlights/walter-russell-mead-world-order). He notes that “our foreign policy arguments are very repetitive” — we argue about the same things in the same ways they would have in George Washington's day.

How it works

  • Strong capitalist economy trading effectively with the world
  • Government promotes infrastructure and helps major American companies succeed internationally
  • Provides the money, technology, and economic strength that holds society together
  • Representative: George H.W. Bush
  • “Human rights! What about human rights?”
  • Bad governance causes threats — dictatorships go to war, democracies don't
  • Promote democracy globally, strengthen international institutions
  • Get rid of war by getting rid of the causes of war
  • America's greatness is personal liberty and limited government
  • Both Wilsonian crusades and Hamiltonian great-power politics create powerful governments with secrets, colossal defense budgets, and endless wars
  • “We can conquer the world and lose our freedom at home”
  • Foreigners can be democratic, I don't really care — as long as they don't attack us or impugn our honor
  • If attacked, go out and crush them; no laws of war, exterminate the enemy
  • “The last thing they should ever do is raise their hand against the United States”
  • In peace, they look like Jeffersonians; after Pearl Harbor or 9/11, they activate
The insight

Every American has a mixed hand of these four “suits,” but some suits are stronger than others. The debate between them has been essentially unchanged since the founding — and understanding which suit dominates explains most American foreign policy behavior.